od Ganec 16. 7. 2013 14:00
Užívateľské recenzie sú (samozrejme) najčastejšie pozitívne, lebo:
- "Nová metla dobre metie, a stará necháva smetie."
- negatívne veci bývajú často ignorované
(znamenalo by to priznať si zlý/nekompetentný výber/prieskum pred nákupom)
- a aj tak sú ovplyvnené všeobecnou mienkou
(keď všade píšu že čosi je OK/NOOK, mnohí si to myslia tiež aj keď zažívajú opak)
Čosi podobné ako som tu vymyslel som si práve prečítal v
diskusii na dpreview:
.. some reviews from non-professionals are solid, well-researched pieces. But some are driven by emotion, by someone who just bought a camera and is all excited to expound on it. Problem is, these reviews often ignore flaws, because the person doing it perceives admitting there are flaws indicates their own judgement is poor. Having said that, it is apparent, however, that major problems with camera equipment are most often discovered by users and NOT professional reviewers who (inexplicably) often miss them.
Olympus PEN-F a E-P5 + mZuiko 17, 45 a 75 mm F1.8, 75-300, 12-50, Sigma 30/1.4
(historická zbierka: Oly SH-2, Fuji F50fd, Konica-Minolta Z10, Casio EX-V8, Sony H20, Olympus PEN E-P1 TLK + Lumix 20 mm F1.7)