
Moderátor: Moderátoři DIGIarena.cz
It seems using both lossless and uncompressed have their advantages. While lossless imports into Lightroom 11.91% faster, uncompressed gains an advantage of just being all around a bit more snappier in Lightroom until some serious effects are applies.
So I want to say there isn’t any real advantage of using lossless compared to uncompressed with Lightroom. Both have their trade-offs.
However, uncompressed is also about twice the size as lossless. So you could fit twice as many files on a hard drive. But for the landscape and studio photography that works in Photoshop with Tiff or PSD files, this would end up not making any difference as they would probably be working in a 16-bit color space anyway.
For photographers on a hard drive budget, it might make sense to use lossless for casual / incidental photography and then switch over to uncompressed when detail and resolution really matter."
Uživatelé procházející toto fórum: Žádní registrovaní uživatelé a 0 návštevníků